Don’t be Deceived by the Vaccine Schedule “Change”

by Steve Halbrook

When a system is at war with you, and it appears to back down, you should consider whether it is a feint.

Whenever we see anything on the surface that appears to be a “victory” — whether regarding vaccination or anything else — we need to stop and critically analyze the situation. Let’s discuss the vaccine schedule “change” — but first, some preliminary considerations.

Narratives have an insidious goal

Considering that the Globalist controllers — wielding the power of central banks over pretty much all of our institutions — control the official narratives (for both the Left and the Right), outside of Divine Intervention, if nature takes its normal course, then the narratives are designed to distract, pacify, neutralize, enslave, and/or murder us.

Whenever the government gives — or seems to give — with one hand, it might be taking with five more hands. Is the ostensible victory a distraction from something else (e.g., a malevolent policy)?

For instance, while folks are screaming victory over the new vaccine policy, the administration is building a super surveillance state — where the nightmare scenario of forced vaccination with unlimited shots is easily conceivable.

Or could it actually be paving the way for the opposite outcome than the supposed victory?

For instance, the notorious 1986 vaccine injury compensation act, which was supposed to protect children from vaccines, ended up being a scam that would immunize vaccine companies from liability and therefore result in an increase in the genocidal vaccine schedule.

The Trump Administration

Of course, many — in an incredible feat of Stockholm Syndrome — convince themselves that the Trump administration is fighting the Globalist system. Which is amazing, considering everything it has done and is doing to build the Globalist tyrannical genocidal technocratic state.

You know, the guy who criticized vaccines in his first campaign, then gave us Operation Warpspeed (after a hefty payment from Pfizer) — the greatest vaccine genocide in history. The guy who said he refuses to take the flu vaccine but militarized it against us. The guy who criticized suspending the Johnson & Johnson COVID shot for causing blood clots. The guy who recently made another deal with Pfizer.

And RFK Jr. himself doesn’t want to end vaccines, despite many good things he has said and done on behalf of the anti-vaccine side. He actually wants to restore trust in them — to “Make Vaccination Great Again.”

Yes, the Globalist Controllers are clever enough to make use of controlled opposition (they do it all the time). They have been playing the long game by using RFK Jr. to build trust with antivaxxers over the years. He was in the right place at the right time when the anticipated distrust in vaccines grew following the COVID vaccine genocide.

The lesson from the Trojan Horse is centuries old, and we still haven’t learned it.

Critically analyzing the schedule change

Okay, let’s look at the childhood vaccine schedule “change” itself. Here’s the new one.

Schedule STILL deadly

The schedule is reduced from 17 to 11 vaccines. Let’s think about that: still 11 vaccines! It only takes one vaccine to kill a child — and 11 remain! That’s enough to put down an elephant, let alone a child!

Not to mention that the schedule includes two notorious multidose (superpoisoned) vaccines: the MMR and the DTaP.

So don’t expect to see vaccine-caused SIDS, cancer, and countless other ailments to go away anytime soon.

Remaining vaccines can be made even DEADLIER

Keeping in mind that the ultimate goal of vaccination is depopulation, it is reasonable to assume that the remaining vaccines in the schedule could just be made deadlier to compensate for the vaccines no longer recommended.

In this way, the likelihood of deaths from vaccination won’t diminish via vaccine roulette: the same amount of poison will still be injected into a child’s arm — maintaining depopulation quotas.

What constitutes a HEALTHY child?

The new recommendations for 11 vaccines only applies to “healthy” children. What constitutes a “healthy” child? Who decides? Can that word be continually redefined to push children into the “unhealthy” category to increase the number of vaccines they get?

See the “Immunizations recommended for Certain High-Risk Groups or Populations” section of the new recommendations. How easy it would be to narrow the “healthy” category and broaden this category. Eleven recommended vaccines can easily become 15, 20, 25, etc.

The stated goal is to INCREASE vaccination

The goal of the schedule change is, quite insidiously, to increase vaccination. This is clear in a January 5, 2026 Decision Memo regarding the schedule change: the memo laments “decreased vaccine uptake” and implies that the schedule change can remedy this:

Current Problem: Decreased Vaccine Uptake and Trust

Childhood vaccination rates in America have fallen over the past five years. …

Robust immunization programs are an essential public health tool, but those tools are only effective when there is public trust. …

The loss of trust in the COVID vaccines coincided with less adherence to the full CDC childhood vaccine schedule, which has resulted in lower immunization rates of well-established vaccines, such as those for measles, rubella, pertussis, and polio.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Decision Memo, DECISION REQUESTED – Adopting Revised Childhood and Adolescent Immunization Schedule (January 5, 2026), 3. Retrieved January 9, 2026, from https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/decision-memo-adopting-revised-childhood-adolescent-immunization-schedule.pdf

Reading between the lines, this clandestine genocide program requires trust for it to work. To maintain depopulation quotas, we must be deceived into seeing our murderers as benevolent life savers.

The new vaccine schedule is a PAPER TIGER – the old schedule CONTINUES

Ever get excited about a certain law being passed — only for it to be disregarded or overturned by liberal judges? If you are excited about the schedule change, think of it like that.

First, note that it is merely recommendations:

The vaccine schedule is a set of recommendations from federal officials. It doesn’t make kids get certain shots, nor does it forbid them from getting others. So parents should technically be able to get their children vaccinated according to the previous schedule.

Jen Christensen, “What parents need to know about the overhauled childhood vaccine schedule” CNN Health (updated Jan. 6, 2026). Retrieved January 9, 2026, from https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/06/health/vaccine-changes-what-to-know

And so as long as there are monetary incentives, expect the system to keep doing what it is doing.

The AAP says it will continue to publish its own Recommended Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule, which is much broader than the government’s shortened list. It includes a yearly flu shot and updated Covid-19 vaccinations.

[Dr. Sean] O’Leary, who’s also a pediatrician in Colorado, thinks things shouldn’t change too much here. Most pediatricians will continue to follow the broader AAP schedule, he says …

Jen Christensen, “What parents need to know about the overhauled childhood vaccine schedule” CNN Health (updated Jan. 6, 2026). Retrieved January 9, 2026, from https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/06/health/vaccine-changes-what-to-know

States, counties assure vaccine access is unchanged
Following the CDC’s announcement yesterday, several states and counties issued statements concerning vaccine access and recommendations. States make the final decisions about school vaccine requirements.

Health officials in Maryland posted on X, saying Maryland’s vaccine schedule will still follow the American Academy of Pediatrics’ (AAP’s) recommended schedule. …

Los Angeles County also said it would continue to follow the existing California Department of Public Health (CDPH) vaccination guidelines for children.

Stephanie Soucheray, “Confusion surrounds CDC’s ‘shared clinical decision-making’ paradigm for childhood vaccines,” CIDRAP (University of Minnesota, January 6, 2026). Retrieved January 9, 2026, from https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/childhood-vaccines/confusion-surrounds-cdc-s-shared-clinical-decision-making-paradigm-childhood

Concluding thoughts — a clever psyop

Are there any conceivable situations where the schedule change may benefit someone?

Yes. One less vaccine could make the difference between life and death, or health and permanent injury. That is, assuming that it was from parents who would have otherwise abided by the old schedule, and assuming that their doctor would have gone along with it. (And assuming the remaining vaccines in the schedule have not been made more poisonous to compensate for vaccines no longer in the schedule.)

But based on what we have discussed, looking at this big picture, what we see is that 1) the powers that shouldn’t be have no interest in ending (either gradually or immediately) the vaccine nightmare, and 2) the goal is to get those to vaccinate who otherwise wouldn’t.

At the very least, what we have is a really clever psyop:

• From the more pro-vaccine side, parents will carry on with the same older schedule as usual
• From the more anti-vaccine side, many parents may become pro-vaccine due to “restored trust.”

All the while, MAGA will be distracted by such hopium as Trump tightens the noose on America by building a surveillance state. (Fight, fight, fight.)

While I am thankful to the extent that some might actually benefit from the schedule change (via injecting less poisons into the body), big picture, nothing has changed. At worst, this will “restore trust” in the genocidal vaccine paradigm, and get droves of otherwise nonvaccinating parents to — due to their trust in Trump and/or Uncle Bobby — unwittingly participate in the childhood genocide program.

Perhaps all of this could be summed up in an analogy. If Stalin told you that he was toning down the purges a little bit, would that make you feel any easier?

If you find this site helpful, please consider supporting our work.

Tagged Deception, Trump