
by Steve Halbrook
If you lived in Russia during the time of Stalin and he told you he wanted to tone down his genocide program, would you believe him?
I would think the obvious answer would be “no!,” and yet, many, thanks in part to leading “anti-vaccine” influencers, seem to believe that Trump is working to tone down the vaccine (genocide) program via his new executive order — even though he instigated Operation Warpspeed — perhaps the greatest vaccine genocide of all time.
The executive order is here — read it for yourself unfiltered. Even if the order itself really does consistently tone down the vaccine program (it doesn’t), for the reason mentioned above, why would you trust Trump to carry it out?
Yes, there could be some instances where some children are less poisoned via the new schedule. But, in the big picture, on net balance, Trump’s order serves to reinforce the genocidal vaccine program.
(By the way, Trump’s order is not enforceable — it is merely a set of recommendations. States have the final say. Unless Trump manipulates them by, say, tying federal funding to their compliance.)
With that said, there is plenty to be concerned about in the order. Let’s look at it.
Vaccines and public schools
The biggest issue is how the vaccine order relates to public schools. With vaccination generally not being mandatory, there are still requirements for children to enter public schools. Some parents have issues with certain vaccines, and would be more at ease if the vaccine schedule was lighter. The order is especially designed to appeal to such parents.
I wish all parents would see that public schools shouldn’t be an issue from the outset; they should never send their children to them. The goal of such schools is to dumb down and progandize children to serve the nefarious agendas of the globalist oligarchs. It is public schools in particular that brainwash Americans into believing the lies about vaccination. We may not even have the vaccine genocide program without it.
So from the outset we see that even if Trump’s order is actually implemented in public schools, it will just generate more favor for public schools which, ironically, further favor for the vaccine death program.
But, parents, the order falls far short in toning down the vaccine schedule to a safe level — an impossible goal, since one vaccine is enough to kill or permanently maim someone.
Combo vaccines
Of all vaccines, the notorious combo vaccines are indeed among the most deadly (perhaps along with mRNA vaccines). As such, Trump’s executive order reads:
The Gold Standard Childhood Vaccine Recommendations also recognize that the combined measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine should be administered in three separate single-disease shots once such products are domestically available and that, to the maximum extent feasible, all childhood immunizations should be administered at separate medical visits.
If you think this is doing away with triple-deadly vaccines, think again. First, the single-dose versions won’t even be available until “domestically available” — whenever that is. Second, they are to be applied “to the maximum extent feasible” — but “feasible” is a very relative term. Finally, the order later says this regarding plans to
offer options to administer core childhood vaccines, starting with MMR, as single vaccines rather than combination products/doses, including by working with the private sector and other countries as appropriate, while guaranteeing continued availability of combination vaccines and those vaccines recommended for shared clinical decision-making;
In short, the combo vaccines would still be optional — their availability is guaranteed. So they are not being phased out.
But there is also an insidious side to this — if single-dose versions ever become available, there are some who will vaccinate for measles, mumps, and rubella who wouldn’t otherwise. There are not anti-vaccine — they just understand how dangerously severe the triple dose cocktail is on a child’s body.
But because they don’t discern that even a single vaccine can be deadly, they would vaccinate for measles, mumps and rubella if available in single doses. What this would achieve is getting such people to increase instead of decrease the amount of poisons they inject into their children.
Moreover, there are other concerns. Let’s say that, due to the executive order, there would be some parents who end up getting the single dose versions of the MMR who would have otherwise gotten the triple dose anyway. Wouldn’t it be safer for children in this case?
Maybe. Hard to say for sure. While they avoid getting all of the poison at once, they get it at separate times. Less at once, but more occasions for poisoning. This aside, there are two ways that it could worse:
Allergic sensitation/anaphylaxis
There are several ways vaccines can kill. One way is overloading one’s body with poison (which triple-dose vaccines are the best at). Another way is allergic sensitation that can kill via anaphylaxis.
The Nobel Prize winner Charles Richet (1850-1935) recognized long ago the dangers of repeated injection of certain substances — especially undigested proteins (which vaccines include). See his 1913 lecture on Anaphylaxis. Also, as Rita Hoffman notes,
It has been shown repeatedly that vaccination can cause sensitization, including anaphylaxis, to vaccine ingredients. Nelson et al (2000) discuss a 4 month old baby’s anaphylactic reaction to the CRM 197 protein in the Hib vaccine. As far back as 1940 Cooke et al noted that “The real object of this presentation is to acquaint the medical profession with proof of the fact that sensitivity can be induced as a result of the present procedures of active immunization to tetanus.” Cooke et al also mentioned Neill et all (1929) noted hypersensitivity to diphtheria bacilli.
Patrizi et al (1999) and Osawa et al (1991) noted allergic sensitization to thimerosal. Martin-Munoz et al described allergic sensitization to tetanus and diphtheria toxoids simultaneously. Kumagai et al (2002) found “gelatin-specific cell-mediated immunity develops in subjects inoculated with gelatin containing DTaP vaccine” and that the specific cellular immune responses persisted for more than 3 years. Sakaguchi et al (1996) concluded that “We reconfirmed a strong relationship between systemic immediate-type allergic reactions including anaphylaxis, to vaccines and the presence of specific IgE to gelatin.” Nakayama et al (1999) found that “DTaP vaccine may have a causal relationship to the development of this gelatin allergy.”
Retrieved April 3, 2024, from http://whale.to/vaccines/hoffman.html
The more one is vaccinated, the more opportunities for allergic sensitation and thereby death by anapylaxis. Separating the 3-dose vaccine cocktail into 3 separate shots exchanges one deadly situation for another.
Increased trauma
The more a child is vaccinated, the more potential for increased trauma that can have a profound, lasting negative effect. Note this from the comment section of Peggy Hall’s (excellent) discussion on Trump’s proposed vaccine schedule change:
I found a man years ago who studied and discovered that just the holding the child down and the stabbing caused actual physical trauma to the child. Ill try to find him if hes still out there. I think he wrote a book on it not sure. It was years ago.
That such actions (analogous to rape) would permanently traumatize a child should be obvious: more vaccines, more trauma.
Tunnel vision and aluminum
Trump’s order discusses plans to:
develop additional alternative adjuvants to aluminum and conduct comparative safety and efficacy studies;
The very legitimate concern for aluminum (and mercury) in vaccines has an insidious trajectory when fixated on to the exclusion of all other vaccine ingredients (since, as history and nature shows us, vaccination in general is inescapably unsafe): the implication is that vaccines can be safe when without certain ingredients.
Sure, some ingredients are more dangerous than others, but the fact of the matter is that vaccination cannot be made safe.
So see how the order leads us to believe that vaccines can be made safe with just the right adjuvants, “proved” by the right “studies” — which would be implemented by the same corrupt system that promoted aluminum in vaccines to begin with!
Giving with one hand, taking with another
To whatever extent the proposed vaccine schedule change might do good, it more than offsets it by reinforcing trust in certain deadly vaccines — as well as the same corrupt system that has alway pushed the vaccine genocide program. We cannot lose sight of the long game, the big picture.
And so, the order refers to “Gold Standard Childhood Vaccine Recommendations.” According to Trump’s order, poisoned shots designed to murder or maim are “gold” — something considered valuable, extremely important. If Trump was really working to tone down or dismantle the genocidal vaccine system, he would not refer to vaccines as “gold.” Rather, he uses propaganda to promote their use.
And what vaccines are “gold”? For the sake of time, we will just cover those in the order recommended for all children:
immunizations recommended for all children: measles, mumps, rubella, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, Haemophilus influenzae type B, pneumococcal disease, human papillomavirus, and varicella;
More than enough vaccines to put down an elephant, let alone a child. While deceived (or deceptive) influencers might be painting a picture that Trump is dismantling the vaccine genocide system, he is obviously actually reinforcing it.
Another way he is reinforcing it is implying that the very corrupt system that fosters vaccine genocide is reliable. Note the favorable refences in the order to “science” (so-called) and “studies” — both of which are used to serve the Globalist order.
A long game psyop?
We just discussed the vaccines still being recommended to all children. The list is still huge. If it looks “small,” that is only because it is viewed relative to the number of vaccines that have been previously recommended. But in reality, the recommended list is still absurdly long. (I know, even one vaccine is absurd, but please bear with me.)
The Globalist oligarchs (who control our politicians) are good at playing the long game. What if their long game strategy to get us to accept an absurd number of vaccines is to push a more absurd number of vaccines — and then when the anticipated pushback comes, push as the “solution” still an absurd number of vaccines; but since it is less than what was previously pushed, people will accept it.
It is like a store charging $100 for a $20 item, then “discounting” it to $80. If the super high price of $100 was never charged at all, then $80 would be clearly seen for the absurd price that it is. But when it is $100 from the outset and “discounted” to $80, you might see it more as saving $20 than spending $60 more than the item is worth.
Perhaps, then, the order is part of a long game tactic to get you to accept an absurd number of vaccines while thinking you are getting only a small number.
Remaining vaccines can be made even DEADLIER
Keeping in mind that the ultimate goal of vaccination is depopulation, it is reasonable to assume that to the extent children may be vaccinated less per the schedule, the vaccines that they do get may be even more deadly than before to compensate for the vaccines no longer recommended. (We are only dealing with the very system that tried to get everyone to take the deadly COVID shot.)
In this way, the likelihood of deaths from vaccination won’t diminish: the same amount of poison will still be injected into a child’s arm — maintaining depopulation quotas. Despite all of this talk about Trump pushing back against the MMR triple-vaccine, it may be that single-shot vaccines may become equivalent in poison.
The best-case scenario
Even the best case scenario is grim. The following from Suzanne Humphries (a leading anti-vaccine voice whom I have much respect for) says this about Trump’s proposed schedule:
Yes, it will help lower infant mortality rates a little bit. (Will pregnant mothers still get mRNA and other shots)?
Those that escaped vaccines in the first two months may survive better but could be later neurologically impaired. And..they will only have lower mortality if vaccinators incorporate the suggested changes from the order. Otherwise it’s the same.
Good to have a lower infant mortality. Not good to relax while so much other damage goes unchecked. More infants may survive, but not for a great future if they will be attacked with ongoing and new jabs, mRNA and every new biological that emerges as a false savior from fear.
Dr Suzanne Humphries, X. Retrieved August 17, 2026, from https://x.com/DrSuzanneH7/status/2087118712004313532
What is the real reason for the executive order?
It should be obvious, considering how our government consistently works, that it is about manipulation and damage control. Think about it: there is more pushback against vaccines than ever since Trump’s genocidal warpspeed program. The tricks to manipulate one into vaccinating (poisoning) must be repackaged.
In other words: “We need more people to trust us into poisoning themselves and their children!” It’s right here — stated differently — in Trump’s order:
The scientific assessment also found that, instead of implementing vaccination mandates, most peer nations maintain high childhood vaccination rates through public trust and education. In the United States, by contrast, individual States set mandatory vaccination requirements that children must meet to attend school.
The idea of restoring trust in vaccines is not new, but a consistent controlled opposition theme in MAGA/MAHA. Hence it being the stated reason for the so-called vaccine schedule change a few months back. RFK Jr., the anti-vaccine movements “great leader,” also doesn’t want to end vaccines, but to restore trust in them — in short, to “Make Vaccination Great Again.”
You see, tyranny requires a degree of compliance to enforce laws on the whole population, and right now — with all the questioning of vaccines due to the COVID scam — enforcement is more difficult than ever. Hence the need for (per the executive order) more “public trust and education” [propaganda].
By playing with words but leaving the essential genocide program intact, the hope is that those on the fence will continue to vaccinate.
Time will tell whether which version of the vaccine genocide schedule will prevail — Trump’s or the states — but in either case, countless children will suffer and die. At the very least, Trump’s order will restore trust in the corrupt system by manipulating many into believing that at least there are those in government working to end vaccine genocide.
Those cheerleading Trump have much to answer for. Promoting him as if he trustworthy is ignorant at best, dishonest at worst. The order won’t affect the adament, rabid pro-vaxxers, and it won’t affect those who will never vaccinate. It targets the “moderates” and waverers — and as such, by building their trust, may actually increase the vaccine genocide program.
The executive order essentially reads as thus:
“We don’t want you to question injecting your children with poison, so here is how we will trick you into continually doing it.”
If you find this site helpful, please consider supporting our work.


