by Stephen Halbrook
Within popular vaccine critic circles, there are several talking points used regularly that actually (even if unwittingly) reinforce the vaccine death program. As such, it is my opinion that these points are influential by design.
You see, the Globalist manipulators realize there will always be pushback against vaccines — and so the best way to minimize the damage of vaccine criticism is to “reward” or “mainstream” talking points (via algorithms, funding, etc.) that oppose vaccination on one hand, but subtly perpetuate it on the other.
Manipulate the sheep by manipulating the shepherds.
However, please note — I am not saying that all popular vaccine critics are consciously acting as controlled opposition (although probably some are — and the popular movement’s support for controlled opposition politicians like Trump and RFK Jr. is very disturbing).
Nor am I saying that no popular vaccine critics are sincere. Nor that no one has been helped to see the errors of vaccines by them. Nor am I saying there is no room to grow (this applies to myself — e.g., I have changed over the years in my views about contagion).
I am just saying that I believe the anti-vaccine culture has been manipulated in such a way as to subtly reinforce the vaccine paradigm to a certain extent; not just with a bad talking point here or there, but with a consistent few talking points.
In short, motives in the popular anti-vaccine movement can vary from being a sincere, caring vaccine critic to a controlled-opposition, intelligence operative.
But whatever the case, if I were in charge of sabotaging the anti-vaccine movement from within, then I would definitely encourage these 6 talking points that are used in the mainstream anti-vaccine movement:
1. “Decide whether to vaccinate by weighing the costs and benefits.”
While doing so would, when one is informed, show that vaccines have many costs and zero benefits, the “costs/benefits” approach also gives one excuse to vaccinate if he is not knowledgeable or discerning enough to see through the propaganda — thinking that there are an overwhelming number of reasons to vaccinate.
However, the worst about making “costs/benefits” the sole basis for whether one vaccinates or not is that it reduces vaccination to merely a matter of pragmatic calculations — thus rendering it an amoral matter. The question of whether it is right or wrong to vaccinate is disregarded, and when this happens, the vaccine death program can continue (as a matter of “personal preference”) without being subjected to (and thus face extinction) by moral judgement: vaccination cannot be labeled as “evil,” though it truly is.
See Vaccine Ethics: Biblical versus “Costs/Benefits”
2. “I would never vaccinate, but I would defend your right to do so.”
As long as the “right to vaccinate” exists, vaccination (and therefore vaccine genocide!) will exist — and all the corruption/propaganda/and coercion that goes along with it. Thus no informed consent — practically speaking, making “the right to vaccinate” the “right to be deceived into taking deadly poison.”
Aside from the insanity of one having the right to unwittingly murder himself or his children, this philosophy exempts those pushing vaccination from facing prosecution and justice for mass murder. And if you think “playing nice” will cause those on the other side to play fair, think again — when in history have the psychopaths at the top of the vaccine pyramid ever been dissuaded from imposing vaccination by our congeniality?
See Should Vaccination be a Matter of CHOICE, or CRIMINALIZED?
3. Not attributing malevolence to vaccination
The idea that vaccination is ultimately done for malevolent reasons seems minimized, if outright ignored within mainstream anti-vaccine circles. Rather, vaccine injuries and genocide are explained by ignorance, incompetence, vaccine idolatry, and profit.
Now, these are all true regarding those pushing vaccines at the lower levels, but those pushing vaccination at the top (the Globalist oligarchs) already have all the money they need (as they control the banks); and, with their power and influence, have access to more information about vaccines than anyone else. Hence they must know that vaccines are worthless and deadly — and they don’t need to financially profit from vaccines.
So that leaves us with other motives: population control (via population reduction and thought control). We know the oligarchs are obsessed with it, and are not beyond using murder to achieve it (consider abortion).
Vaccination makes the population more controllable by mass poisoning, weakening them to make them more compliant and less likely to oppose tyranny. Reducing the population with vaccine-caused deaths (either immediately or over time) and infertility also makes the population more easy to manage.
And beyond this, it seems vaccine genocide is ultimately motivated by human sacrifice to feed the dark spiritual entities that control the Globalist agenda.
What is the practical effect of not attributing vaccine genocide to malevolence? It serves to give the murderers “a pass,” and paints our system as not being controlled by genocidal psychopaths, but those who are potentially trustworthy to do the right thing about vaccines (if it just had enough information on the matter).
See Vaccines for Population Control: Why?
4. “Vaccines need to be made safe.”
While many vaccines can be made less dangerous than they are now (by reducing the poisonous ingredients), they can never be made safe. Vaccination is the injection of foreign substances into the bloodstream — put another way, forcing into the body unnatural material in an unnatural way.
Thus the “vaccines can be made safe” assertion perpetuates the vaccine paradigm by fostering the idea that the vaccine program can be redeemed instead of terminated.
See God’s Natural Order shows the Fallacy of Vaccination
5. Appeal to vaccine “safety” testing
Pointing to a particular vaccine not getting the normal safety testing protocols (like the COVID shot) may persuade some to not get that vaccine (giving the argument a certain amount of value) — but it also affirms the legitimacy of the corrupt vaccine system overall. All vaccine safety testing is a fraud, designed to give inherently unsafe vaccines the illusion of safety.
Thus whether vaccines bypass or undergo “safety testing,” the game is rigged. What appealing to safety testing does is legitimize all vaccines that “successfully” undergo such. And even if one advocates for “more stringent” safety testing than we have now, one affirms that our corrupt, psychopathic system can potentially be trusted with vaccines.
See Vaccine “Safety” Studies: Infallible or CORRUPT?
6. Affirming virology/immunity
Virology — almost universally affirmed in the anti-vaccine mainstream — is the foundational marketing for vaccination. Without contagious disease paranoia, no one would vaccinate. Thus when we argue against vaccination but affirm virology, we nevertheless perpetuate the marketing that drives people to vaccination to begin with.
Also, the idea of an immune system follows from virology. We do in fact have particular bodily defenses, but I prefer to frame it as just that — not an immune system, which implies virology and again, perpetuates the marketing that drives people to vaccination to begin with.
(I understand this issue can be hard for even the most hardcore anti-vaxxers to accept. It took me a long time to accept it, and part of the problem is that those who oppose virology don’t always give the best alternative explanations. See the links below, starting with this, which includes my views of vaccine “shedding.”)
See Immune System: Real, or an Invention to Trick us into Vaccinating?
If you find this site helpful, please consider supporting our work.
