by Steve Halbrook
Two prostitutes came before the wise King Solomon because of the death of one of their children. Both had children recently, and one complained that the other had killed her own child at night after laying on him, and then switched their children while she slept.
The other insisted that the living child was hers.
This is how Solomon deals with it:
Then said the king, The one saith, This is my son that liveth, and thy son is the dead: and the other saith, Nay; but thy son is the dead, and my son is the living.
And the king said, Bring me a sword. And they brought a sword before the king.
And the king said, Divide the living child in two, and give half to the one, and half to the other.
Then spake the woman whose the living child was unto the king, for her bowels yearned upon her son, and she said, O my lord, give her the living child, and in no wise slay it. But the other said, Let it be neither mine nor thine, but divide it.
Then the king answered and said, Give her the living child, and in no wise slay it: she is the mother thereof.
And all Israel heard of the judgment which the king had judged; and they feared the king: for they saw that the wisdom of God was in him, to do judgment. (1 Kings 3:23-28, KJV)
Solomon counted on the trustworthiness of parental affection: that when it comes to a child’s physical welfare, parents tend to want what they think is best for him. Not to say that there are no exemptions, but in all probability — due to the natural affection God gives parents for their children — when it comes to life and death, parents are more protective of their own children than anyone else would be.
Now, regarding vaccination, we have countless parents who have witnessed their children suffering injury or death following this procedure. And yet, their testimony is dismissed by the vaccine propagandists, who say that only a doctor is qualified to determine if the vaccine caused death (and at that, only doctors who will always say that the vaccine was not the cause of harm). As if parents don’t know about their child well enough, or care enough about their child, to discern that vaccination was the cause of harm.
All of this, even though the doctor is blinded by ignorance at best — if not money, self-interest, and unwillingness to risk his job to consider the obvious. (Or even motivated by malevolence.) Scripture says
And you shall take no bribe, for a bribe blinds the clear-sighted and subverts the cause of those who are in the right. (Exodus 23:8, ESV)
Considering this, when a child is harmed by vaccination, which testimony is more trustworthy? The doctor who is bought and paid for by Big Pharma — or the parent with natural affection for his child? The doctor who risks nothing by going along with the government-backed narrative, or the parent who risks ridicule, slander, or even something worse for pointing out the obvious?
In short, parents have much credibility — they know their children, and have a natural affection for them. Contrast this with the typical doctor, who has financial incentives to vaccinate children, and not to oppose the vaccine narrative for fear of losing his license (losing his job might mean not paying off his expensive loans for medical school and giving up his luxurious lifestyle).
Moreover — how many doctors have the moral courage to admit to a parent that they harmed or even killed his child via vaccination?
The vaccine propagandists lack the wisdom of Solomon. Even in matters where death by vaccination is obvious, they almost always side with the doctor who refuses to admit that he killed a child, and lies to cover it up — just like the prostitute who did the same. Unlike Solomon — who sides with the mother guided by natural, parental affection to preserve the life of her child.
Even worse, while Solomon was bluffing in saying “Divide the living child in two” to draw out the compassion of the true mother, there are heartless vaccine propagandists out there who are surely aware of the vaccine holocaust, and yet would actually have countless children cut in two to further the financially profitable vaccine program.
If you find this site helpful, please consider supporting our work.
