by Steve C. Halbrook
When we simply consider God’s natural order (the basis of science), we find the process of vaccination inherently flawed — and can save ourselves a lot of pain and suffering that comes from vaccinating.
But the problem is that we don’t think to consider God’s natural order as it relates to health. Why is this?
First and foremost, churches need to teach a thorough biblical worldview of health.
But besides this, the globalist elite that peddles the vaccine narrative and controls our “scientific” institutions have removed any consideration of God when it comes to science.
This suits them fine, since without God’s created order as the first principle of science, we are hampered in making commonsense scientific judgements and more likely to blindly follow the globalist-backed “scientific” elite.
In this scheme, after all, nothing is designed with purpose; everything is random and chaotic (think evolution) — the perfect formula for blindly relying on gurus who alone understand the latest scientific advancements and can interpret the world for us.
But despite what they would have us believe, God is the first principle in science. In Him we live and move and have our being. He is the source of all creation and makes the rules by which it functions.
Let’s consider those rules as it relates to vaccination — both in its supposed efficacy and safety.
Vaccination is not self-evidently scientific, and therefore efficacious. If anything, it is self-evidently unscientific, as it does not engage the body in the same way that so-called vaccine preventable diseases supposedly do. Such diseases (should they exist) enter the body via the mucosal route (e.g., mouth or nose), whereas vaccination enters the body via injection.
And so we are talking about a totally different interaction of bodily processes. And if we accept the immune system narrative, two different ways of triggering the immune system (with vaccination bypassing the primary immune response that natural infection triggers).
This alone should at least give us pause in believing that vaccines are “effective.”
But what should also give us pause in assuming vaccine efficacy is the vaccine narrative’s holding that absence of disease symptoms (e.g., fever, malaise, rash) means that one is “protected” — and has thus developed “immunity.”
Not that vaccines don’t commonly give people the very disease symptoms (even in a worse way) that they claim to combat; but let us note that disease symptoms are actually your body’s means of fighting disease.
As such, are the absence of disease symptoms post-vaccination necessarily “protection” from disease — or are they your body’s inability (triggered by the unnatural process of vaccination) to properly fight disease?
Indeed, a case can be made that by vaccination’s unnatural route, the foreign substances in vaccination cannot properly expel from the body. Hence the absence of (if not extreme manifestation of) disease symptoms where diseases push further into one’s body, causing sooner or later chronic health problems and even assault one’s vital organs.
This can all be easily conceived of when we again consider God’s natural order: when we do something the wrong way, we get bad results. When something is not properly expelled, it backs up until there is a burst.
Let’s further develop these thoughts to show that the suppression of physical symptoms (as vaccination attempts to do) is not necessarily a good thing.
As an alarm system, pain protects us from injuries. But if a procedure keeps me from feeling pain in a certain area of my body, does it mean that that part of the body is injury-free? If anything, losing the ability to feel can mask current injuries and lead to more.
Coughing protects us from choking to death. What if I suppress my ability to cough when food is caught in my throat? I’m immune to choking to death, right? Wrong — if anything, I’m increasing my likelihood of dying.
This is actually a fair comparison to vaccination regarding its ingredients: being an unnatural route (with foreign substances entering the bloodstream unfiltered), vaccination bypasses our bodily defenses (our “coughing mechanisms”) designed to keep vaccine ingredients out of our body. And so just as preventing a cough keeps us from expelling food lodged in our throat, vaccination keeps us from expelling poisons that will become lodged in our bloodstream.
To speak figuratively, the fact that the vaccine doesn’t make us cough doesn’t mean that we have immunity — it may actually mean that, if not immediately, we may in time choke to death.
It is just going back to God’s natural design. God has given us the skin to protect our bodies from foreign substances. He has also given us bodily defenses (such as the gut, which filters and detoxifies foreign substances to protect the bloodstream) should we assimilate foreign substances through the mucosal route.
And so in a nutshell, vaccination very dangerously disregards both of these integral aspects of God’s natural design by injection of foreign substances directly into the body, bypassing our primary bodily defenses.
To give an analogy to drive the point home, consider the route of snake venom. A snake bite is much more dangerous than drinking snake venom because it bypasses the same bodily defenses as vaccination. Would you, then, be willing to be bitten by a venous snake to protect yourself from the possibility of a droplet of snake venom someday going into your nose or mouth?
(And please, let’s now even justify it on the basis of it being “just trace amounts” — which magnify greatly, so to speak, when in a vulnerable place like the bloodstream).
Considering God’s natural order, I’ll take a “vaccine-preventable disease” the natural way anytime over injection.
And so what would we expect from such brazen disregard for God’s wisdom and natural design that we see in vaccination — other than illness and death? Making decisions based on God’s wisdom is a much safer path than the unnatural route of vaccination.
If you find this site helpful, please consider supporting our work.
